Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests

Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests.

Costfoto / NurPhoto / Getty Images

Key Takeaways

The US Department of the Interior decided not to approve Class III gaming compacts with two California tribes — the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria and the Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Indians — claiming that they violated portions of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

Tachi Palace Casino ResortThe Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif, seen above. The federal government recently denied two compacts signed by the State of California, including one with the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria to expand their resort. (Image: tachipalace.com)

Both tribes were reportedly planning a “casino resort complex,” according to rejection letters sent to the tribes and the state. These plans include building new restaurants and hotels that operate beyond the gaming spaces regulated by the Tribe’s Gaming Commission.

Taking issue with several definitions in the compacts, the feds wrote, The 2022 compact confers expansive powers on the state and local governments to regulate the tribe’s activities and lands that are not directly related to the actual conduct of gaming.”

State-tribal Class III gaming compacts are agreements between the state and separate tribal governments that specify how many gaming devices and casinos a single tribe can operate, according to the Tribal Alliance of Sovereign Indian Nations.

The Santa Rosa Rancheria had planned to expand the gaming space in their Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif. by 44,000 square feet and build a 12-room hotel tower, a bingo hall/conference center, and a three-level garage.

Newsom Slams Decision

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) strongly rebuked the feds’ decision, warning of its repercussions. He said in a statement that the disapprovals Threaten the ability of these and other tribes to invest and maintain jobs in many of California’s economically disadvantaged communities.

He noted that the compacts were “carefully negotiated by the state and the tribes in compliance with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act” to give tribes the “economic benefits of gaming while mitigating impacts to local communities.” And he noted that this latest agreement came on top of existing compacts signed between the tribes and the state in 1999.

This is the second time the Interior Department has disapproved of compacts with the same tribes, following a similar decision in November 2021.

California has ratified gaming compacts with 75 tribes, and currently hosts 66 casinos operated by 63 tribes, according to the California Gambling Control Commission.

Article Sources
Casino Developers Will Have to be Patient on Japanese Regulation, Says Analyst editorial policy.
  1. China Casino Blacklist Expands, But Public in Dark Regarding Banned Destinations

Compare Accounts
×
Kentucky Starts Court Action to Get Money from Flutter in $1.3B Online Poker Case
Provider
Name
Description
Oneida Casino Shooting By Police Reviewed For Justification  Arizona Tohono O’odham Nation Breaks Ground on $400 Million Casino After Eight-Year Delay  Paddy Power Updates Donald Trump Odds, as Kim Jong Un Sentences US President to Death  Alabama Still Favorite to Win National Championship, Barkley Takes Over Heisman Race  Amaya Debt Restructuring Designed to Keep Ex-CEO David Baazov in the Cold  China Travel Ban Costs South Korea $4.6 Billion in Tourism Revenues, Impacting New Casinos  Cleveland Indians Win Streak Hits 20, Tribe Now World Series Favorites in Las Vegas  G2E Asia Focuses on Resort Experience Beyond Gaming  Australia Reports Sharp Rise in Online Gambling Spending During Coronavirus Shutdown  South Carolina Casino Legalization Supported by Residents, Georgia Folds on Efforts